New Assembly ‘Shop Window’ Launched

12/12/2011

by: Assembly Round Up

Our new website is live!  As the window to the work of the Assembly, the website combines ease of use and lots of new features designed to make finding what you want easy and fast. We’ve taken people’s views on board along the way and it’s been designed with you in mind.

Finding out about Your MLAs is now much easier.  If you don’t know who your MLAs are you can use our Constituency Map to find out. Our new information management system (AIMS) allows you to search for questions that MLAs have asked Ministers – both in the Chamber (oral) or in writing.  You can also see the answer they received. 

As well as finding out which debates your MLAs took part, we’ve a great new feature that lets you see how your MLAs voted. This will be available for votes when the House divides. The information will be available shortly after the vote has been counted.

Other new features include an email subscription service to receive alerts when new information is added to the website for the areas you are interested in.  What’s happening that Assembly is front and centre on the home page, making it very easy for you to find out what is going on.  And all your old favourites are still there too – watching Assembly debates live, RSS feeds for general alerts, details on Committees and their work, and much more.

Some of you might want to know how much this project cost – the total cost for research, design and build of the new website was £182,730.

While getting to this stage has been a big project, we will not be resting on our laurels – over the coming months and years we will be introducing new features to make the user experience richer and more interactive. Let us know what you think of the site by completing our short Feedback Form to help us continue to improve.

Comments:

  1. £182,730k? Is that £182,730,000?

    12 December 2011 15:04
    by: Adam

    Permanent link

  2. 182,000 for this web site.... as a web developer and a TAX PAYER im disgusted, this web site isn't even worth 10% of what was paid

    12 December 2011 15:23
    by: barry

    Permanent link

  3. What a Joke! £182000 for this? Wise up am I reading this wrong? There are MANY great web design agencies in Belfast who could do a much better job for much less cash

    12 December 2011 15:27
    by: Stephen Kinkaid

    Permanent link

  4. Not To disrespect the website but was a ripoff - but what i want to know is how can you justify to pay that much for a website then that money could be used better for other causes

    12 December 2011 15:29
    by: Adrian

    Permanent link

  5. @barry - the site is built on EPiServer, so there will have been a license cost for that - probably a fairly significant chunk of the overall cost. Services of a specialist design and development agency could easily cost the rest. £180,730k [sic] doesn't seem totally outrageous. However, things like no title on the home page are a poor start to justifying the cost and there is room for loads of design improvements.

    12 December 2011 15:31
    by: Webby

    Permanent link

  6. @webby, how can a web site like this justify requiring a $51,000 CMS? There are free alternatives out there that would have accommplished the exact same thing. wordpress? joomla? drupal? Many USA government web sites are built using these $51000 is approx £32000, so deduct that from it, I stilll do not believe this web site is worth 150,000. is that what it was? £150,000 for the site plus the licence? disgusting

    12 December 2011 15:50
    by: barry

    Permanent link

  7. im not huge on validation, but for 180k i would expect an xHTML valid web site http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.niassembly.gov.uk%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0 the developer hasnt even changed the standard keywords on the home page from EPIServer, they read: "CMS, content, commerce, e-commerce, communication, community" they dont sound to appropriate to the Northern Ireland Assembly? the title tag is

  8. EPiServer

    12 December 2011 15:52
    by: barry

    Permanent link

  9. im also not shocked to see the developer has forgotten to include a description meta tag on the home page. google will love you ni assembly....

    12 December 2011 15:56
    by: barry

    Permanent link

  10. I would like to see the applications from the tendering!!

    12 December 2011 16:18
    by: completejoke

    Permanent link

  11. £182,730k for the piece of muck :-O I'm a web developer working for a Belfast Agency and we could put together a more professional, finished website for around £10,000 - £15,000. Design? What design? A 1st year IMD student could come up with something better that. That extra £168,000k must of went on prawn sandwiches for the meetings.

    12 December 2011 16:19
    by: Ryan

    Permanent link

  12. This takes the biscuit.

    12 December 2011 16:21
    by: George Glenn

    Permanent link

  13. What a joke! Unimaginative, uninspiring and quite frankly an insult to someone who works in the creative arts/media sector. Everyone involved with awarding the tender needs to sit down a do some research. And the company responsible for the 'design' should be ashamed! It looks like a template from Microsoft Office! Morons!

    12 December 2011 16:23
    by: Scott

    Permanent link

  14. And it doesn't format correctly on iOS! Of course it doesn't why am I not surprised!

    12 December 2011 16:25
    by: Scott

    Permanent link

  15. Makes you wonder why anyone ever tries to make anything better when all they get is attacked. I think it's a great improvement on what went before well done to everyone involved.

    12 December 2011 16:32
    by: Dessertspoon

    Permanent link

  16. Nice to see well supported video formats being used too - http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/Assembly-Business/Live-Coverage/Video-Live-Stream-1/ If you use OS X forget about it.

    12 December 2011 16:35
    by: Andy

    Permanent link

  17. Can we have a breakdown of the £180K budget please?

    12 December 2011 16:35
    by: ##belfast

    Permanent link

  18. @Dessertspoon .... emmh you saw the price right? £185k..

    12 December 2011 16:58
    by: kitchenknife

    Permanent link

  19. Price does seem to be going up but it's now risen tenfold to £185,000,000. As a taxpayer I demand to know what the additional 184 million GBP has been spent on!

    12 December 2011 17:03
    by: Jane

    Permanent link

  20. Ryan, I take it you don't deal with financials for your Belfast Agency. I'd be interested to see how long your £15k budget would last when purchasing hardware and licenses, let alone porting across hundreds of thousands of pages and content items.

    12 December 2011 17:20
    by: Interested Observer

    Permanent link

  21. Biznet http://www.biznetiis.com/News---Announcements/2011/August-2011/We-are-elected!-biznet-IIS-win-exciting-six-figure.aspx

    12 December 2011 17:21
    by: itwasbiznet

    Permanent link

  22. I think this site is the perfect example of a standard government tendered site. Cost too much and isnt as usable as it should be. To not even include a

  23. tag or have the correct elements for forms is very lazy. @Ryan I think you underestimate the size of this site, it would cost 10 to 15,000 to transfer just the large quantity of content. All in all I think its an improvement on most Government sites but it would be great to see the breakdown of cost.

    12 December 2011 17:22
    by: Mark K

    Permanent link

  24. i am a freelance web developer with 3 year experiance and i know for a fact i could do a far better job never mind the fact many people a are struggling to live when the budget is being blown on this piece of crap. Im sorry but i want to meet the company behind this and ask them who did the maths!

    12 December 2011 17:52
    by: Jordan

    Permanent link

  25. All that money and not one bit of comic sans :(

    12 December 2011 18:00
    by: bob

    Permanent link

  26. Well at least 'Find your MLA' works the way it... oh, wait, nope. Just gives me a map with some colours and no context whatsoever.

    12 December 2011 18:09
    by: Chris

    Permanent link

  27. Loving all the wannabe web developers telling us how better a job they could do, and for less money!! Where were you all when they were tendering the project I wonder?

    12 December 2011 18:12
    by: john holmes

    Permanent link

  28. Cheap as chips! Depending on where you are buying the chips! I'm guessing the majority of the money was spent on "research" for the MLA's to try and work out what a website even is! Well done lads! Keep up the good work on getting us out of this recession!

    12 December 2011 18:18
    by: Jamie

    Permanent link

  29. Well from what I know the site was put out to tender in two lots. Research and design lot 1 and technical build lot 2. Blue Cube won the first lot along with some research company and spent nearly 100k running workshops etc. but then like all things in nordern ireland its hard to beat a rumour. Not sure what buznet got for the technical build or who is doing the hosting?? But at least it did not fall over today!!

    12 December 2011 18:29
    by: sitting on the side lines

    Permanent link

  30. Ok, in the interest of giving constructive feedback, I think we need the following answered by someone involved in the project: 1. What problems did this redesign set out to solve? 2. Is £182k a fair price for solving those problems? 3. How did the project team (both public and private sector) take to arrive at this solution? I think those are fair and balanced questions, and look forward to a response.

    12 December 2011 18:43
    by: Chris Armstrong

    Permanent link

  31. Everyone's an expert, aren't they? To all the junior/small/freelance agencies whoring their wares and abilities - do you know anything of the detail of the project? Do you know anything of the content strategy involved in creating or migrating a site like this? The end result does not justify the costs (and it's a poor technical showcase for Biznet, really), but I can fully see how it was arrived at, especially if design and build were done by different agencies - something I strongly feel never really serves anyone's best interests. However, when all is said and done, the site has a purpose and business goals and end users who are not all web experts. If their needs are served adequately (something which can only be judged over time), then regardless of the views of the technical community, the project can be viewed as a success.

    12 December 2011 18:43
    by: Webby

    Permanent link

  32. At least nia had the confidence to print the spend, I know of a few other public projects that have wasted more.... Still pretty poor that no open source CMS was used but hey welcome to let's pass the buck culture....

    12 December 2011 19:46
    by: valleyboy

    Permanent link

  33. Very brave to post how much the site cost but one obvious major flaw - even a basic breakdown of how it was spent would have blown quite a few of these opinions out of the water. From a design point of view, a wee bit of papyrus in the menus would have finished it off perfectly.

    12 December 2011 19:51
    by: Marty

    Permanent link

  34. Oh and another two things, you seriously need to regulate comments before they can be posted and the main nav doesn't render out on android....

    12 December 2011 19:56
    by: valleyboy

    Permanent link

  35. Regarding the costs - Ask what it covers before making judgements. My information is that the cost covers Design work, Software purchases with ongoing maintenance, configuration to include complex automated workflows to ensure up to date information is available and hosting All for 3 - 5 years. Please note the Portal section in particular is very complex with "live" updates from Assembly systems. It is costly but the expenditure had to satisfy internal controls and no doubt will be examined by the Press and the NI Audit Office

    12 December 2011 20:22
    by: Old Hand

    Permanent link

  36. All that money and not an email address between them....sigh :(

    12 December 2011 20:45
    by: Save the trees

    Permanent link

  37. For £180,000 they could have at least made it mobile compliant. But to be honest I know from previous experience that most government websites cost about the same amount. It's not what the website is worth its more to do with the amount of time it takes to get it done. Most government sites have to many people involved at the client end and they all want to have their say and make stupid changes which in turn drives up the cost of the site.

    12 December 2011 20:58
    by: JHDesigner

    Permanent link

  38. Webby I'm assuming your a civil servant and work on this, did you delete my posts if so why?

    12 December 2011 21:00
    by: valleyboy

    Permanent link

  39. JHDesigner your dead right. I'm working on a project now which has saved £8k going to an open source CMS.....

    12 December 2011 21:02
    by: valleyboy

    Permanent link

  40. Webby or whoever is moderating apologies....

    12 December 2011 21:03
    by: valleyboy

    Permanent link

  41. On reviewing comments here and on Twitter, it appears that the redesign is pleasing everyone except the junior design community.

    12 December 2011 21:57
    by: Interested Observer

    Permanent link

  42. @interested observer, I can see past the fact that it doesn't look great; big deal. It's the usability issues that are unacceptable. I can't find my way around the site, so I don't know how a pensioner is supposed to. Was there any serious usability testing done on this?

    12 December 2011 22:42
    by: Chris

    Permanent link

  43. RAISE and AIMS are great tools. And there's lots of other stuff that I'm exploring at the moment. Arraying that level of information undoubtedly involves a huge time commitment from civil service personnel. I suspect the £180k includes months of research / non-design work. I'm going to withhold negative comment 'til I see the cost breakdown. My first impression is that it's a good site.

    12 December 2011 23:30
    by: Geoff

    Permanent link

  44. I’m 12 and what is this?

    13 December 2011 00:35
    by: .

    Permanent link

  45. WOW Public money easy come easy go. To spend this amount of money on this site is beyond a joke. Clearly all those communication people had no idea what they were doing and the web designers ran away with the money!!!

    19 March 2013 22:47
    by: Colin

    Permanent link


Post a comment

Image for user verification
 

Find Your MLA

Locate your local MLA

Find MLA

News and Media Centre

Read press releases, watch live and archived video.

Find out more

Follow the Assembly

Keep up to date with what's happening at the Assembly.

Find out more

Subscribe

Enter your email address to keep up to date

Sign up